So, the test series has finally come to a humiliating yet expected end for the once-upon-a-time invincible Aussies. Many experts claim that with the unofficial revenge series now in the bag (and how), India is on the right track to reclaim its number one Test Ranking. While this is highly debatable, the picture will become more clearer once India tours South Africa , New Zealand and England between 2013-2014.
While it's obvious that a 4-0 margin has clearly exposed the inadequacies the Australian team faces on several fronts, it also gives a subtle reflection of what the current team lacks in abundance vis-a-vis the past dominating Aussie teams - and here we are not talking about the talent or experience or key personnel, we are talking about 'INTIMIDATION' and 'AGGRESION'. Past Australian teams have always been associated with these two key aspects-facets that have come to be known as a part of the Aussie culture. It had played a crucial role in their era of dominance, but unfortunately these are glaringly missing from the current lot. And no marks for guessing, who are responsible for this, of course the captain and the coach.
Talking about Michael Clarke aka pup, while he has had the best twelve months with the willow in hand, his leadership qualities especially on the field have often been much revered. Coach Mickey Arthur himself has been a highly successful South African coach having orchestrated the rise of the team to number one in one day international rankings. While the credentials of the two look most impressive and seem a match made in heaven, apparently their combination is proving to be otherwise. Their insistence on having a very specific team culture, coupled with dire consequences for those not adhering to their diktats has made the team not only more disjointed but also robbed the essential qualities of a typical Aussie player.
A perfect example could be seen in the recent test match played in Delhi, where Shane Watson was captaining the side in place of Clarke. Day two of the match saw some high voltage action, with the Aussies finally displaying raw emotions while being on the field. Australia managed to get under the Indian skins after Warner had a heated verbal altercation with Jadeja, igniting tensions in the final session of the game, after which Jadeja approached the umpires who then summoned Watson to pacify the feisty opener.
During the post match conference, Nathan Lyon dropped a hint of what he felt was sorely missing in the side and stated that the brief moment of tension may have built pressure on Dhoni and could have been one of the factors that led to the dismissal of the Indian captain. In stating so, he also added that they should have tried to unsettle the home side well before they crashed to a 3-0 deficit.
Aggression is one of the ways by which this team plays its best cricket as they put the contest to the opposition and history has shown that no matter whoever the opposing team is, this method has always worked well for Australia. And this is primarily the reason why, day two of the test match belonged to them. While it's obvious that Watson and Arthur don't share the kind of relation, Clarke and Arthur share, what was stand out was the marked difference in the approach undertaken by the team when it had a change in personnel at the top. While Watson is more free spirited and more of a person who hates to be governed by rules, Clarke is in fact the exact opposite.
As a cricket aficionado, I strongly feel that until and unless the famed Aussie culture of yesteryears is not brought back immediately into the fold, this Australian team will keep scaling down one summit after the other (especially with the forthcoming back-to-back Ashes looming large ). That is why it is important for the betterment of the team and cricket in general that the team management allows the players to freely express themselves on the field rather than making them puppets at the hands of those in power.